Cockpits!

11 Comments
For those who haven't seen what the fighters look like from the inside, here you go:

Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II


There's no doubt about it, the F-35's cockpit is the future.  A wide, full color, touchscreen is the dominant feature.  With touchscreen capability and countless features, the F-35's display will no doubt be just the thing for a generation of pilots used to iPads and smartphones.

There is no heads-up-display (HUD).  Vital information is instead relayed directly onto the pilot's visor using the helmet mounted display, simulated in green in this picture.  Using the F-35's sensors, the helmet mounted display can even allow the pilot to "look through" the aircraft.  

Future concepts for the Saab Gripen and Boeing Super Hornet show a very F-35-like cockpit layout.

Eurofighter Typhoon


The Eurofighter Typhoon sticks with a much more conventional layout.  Three large multifunction displays (MFDs) along the traditional HUD, buttons, and dials.  The Typhoon's cockpit ergonomics has been praised by its pilots, however.  A helmet mounted cueing system is utilized, as well as a voice control allowing the pilot to select targets or perform many other functions simply by voice.

Dassault Rafale


The Dassault Rafale's cockpit is...  Well...  Different.

It certainly appears clean and uncluttered, with a traditional HUD, side mounted stick, and 3 MFDs.  For some reason, however, the two touchscreen side MFDs are located far forward, with the center MFD magnified by a lens resembling an old fashioned microfiche reader.  It's actually a head level display (HLD) that displays information at the same focal distance as the HUD.

While the Thales TopOwl-F helmet mounted display would seem like a no-brainer for the Rafale, it has yet to be realized in operational form.

Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet


In comparison to the others, the Super Hornet's cockpit looks like a blast from the past with its monochrome green displays and array of dials, switches and buttons.  This picture is a bit deceiving, however, as it is quite a few years old, and the Super Hornet has gone through a few changes since then.  


The newest proposed Super Hornet cockpit would look eerily close to the F-35's, with a wide touchscreen and a HUD replaced by a helmet mounted display.

Saab JAS-39 Gripen 


The current Gripen C cockpit very much resembles the Eurofighter Typhoon workspace, three large MFDs with a traditional HUD.  No real surprises here.


The proposed "NG" models of the Gripen, the E and F, will likely adapt a similar single large touchscreen as utilized by the F-35.  Again, it eschews a traditional HUD in favor of a helmet mounted display.  Without a doubt, this is where fighter cockpit design is going.

Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor

For sake of comparison, this is what the current "king of the sky" F-22 cockpit looks like.  Nothing groundbreaking here.  Just MFDs, and a traditional HUD.  The F-22 still lacks a helmet mounted display, as well.  

Popular posts from this blog

THE REAL REASON THE GRIPEN LOST...

Image
  For those of you wondering how Saab lost the FFCP competition, new information has come to light... According inside sources, the initial scoring of the two fighters was incredibly close.  The F-35 did indeed win the "Capability" category (worth up to 60%) while the Gripen E ended up being ahead on both price (worth 20%) and industrial offsets (worth the remaining 20%).   According to my source April Furst, who is currently serving an internship in the House of Commons.  The ultimate decision was made rather hastily while the final scores were being tallied up.   "Due to COVID restrictions and renovations, the FFCP committee were forced to convene in a remote office located in the basement of the Parliament building.  You could tell it wasn't used very often.  Lots of cobwebs, and the whole place smelled musty and moldy.   "The committee members were doing their thing, going down each individual line of the respective offers.  It was actual...
Read more

Fighter Jet Fight Club: Gripen NG vs. Super Hornet!

Image
I will be honest...  I have been dreading this installment of Fighter Jet Fight Club.  I tend to root for the underdog in any competition, but what happens when underdogs have to compete against each other?  Both of these aircraft have a 0-2 record for FJFC, yet both are clearly crowd favorites in the comment section. Our contestants today are two of the biggest value propositions in the fighter world today.  Both are "modernized" versions of aircraft that have been flying since the 80s.  Neither make promises of being the most dominant force in the skies, but they do promise a "90%" solution at "50%" of the cost.  Most importantly, both aircraft are "tried and true" designs that have provided years of faithful service.  Despite this, they are often overlooked in favor of newer, flashier aircraft like the F-35 Lightning II. Which aircraft will see redemption here today? Just remember the rules . Air-to-Ground: Infiltration/Pe...
Read more

FINAL THOUGHTS

Image
  So…. Now what? The process is still far from over but what is left is mostly mundane and bureaucratic.  Stuff like finalizing costs, delivery dates, etc. Hopefully, Canada can now focus it procurement efforts on  revitalizing the rest of the Canadian Armed Forces.  With fighters and frigates out of the way; it’s high time we look into replacing our submarines, MRTTs, and other.  Recent lessons from the war in Ukraine has also made it clear that UCAVs are the future of warfare.  Canada best catch up. Was all this for nothing?  No.  I do not believe so.  Even though Canada is still choosing the F-35, it is doing so in a much more rational way.  We have taken the time to evaluate our needs.  Taken a clear look at the options.  We have arrived at a decision removed from political whim.  Ultimately, Canada is getting a lot more aircraft than initially planned.  We are also getting later build F-35s.  Now, more of th...
Read more