F-35 catches fire at Eglin Air Force Base!

(Not from today's incident)


I wonder if the F-35's grounding due to a faulty oil valve got lifted prematurely...

This is breaking news.  More here:  http://news.usni.org/2014/06/23/breaking-fire-breaks-f-35-eglin-air-force-base-pilot-safe

Comments

  1. Doug AllenJune 23, 2014 at 11:03 PM

    I wonder if there would be so much coverage or knowledge of the good and bad days when the F-15

    ReplyDelete
  2. Doug AllenJune 24, 2014 at 2:46 AM

    Exactly Paul, LM put the cart before the horse.

    There was quite a lot of coverage when the Gripen's first prototype crashed in 1989. Luckily, the pilot had a narrow escape.
    Remember the second launch of Ariane 1, it was a failure too.

    Testing that's why you make prototypes because you know accidents happen.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Doug AllenJune 24, 2014 at 3:52 AM

    I believe that LM soon will make the following anouncement :

    "The needed fix that followed the F-35 mishap on Eglin will actually make the aircraft considerably lighter as the systems that were intended to supress / extinguish clearly did not work and thus can be removed. Another good news is that the F-35 now can be advertised and sold internationally as "Battle Proven" as it without any doubts been under fire...",

    ReplyDelete
  4. Doug AllenJune 24, 2014 at 9:48 AM

    Nice Job!
    I guess it is not like an airline, where you get to pick your engine. This engine appears not to work, I will take the rolls Royce or the GE?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Doug AllenJune 24, 2014 at 10:45 AM

    I believe the engine is a Pratt & Whitney

    ReplyDelete
  6. Doug AllenJune 25, 2014 at 11:29 AM

    That's the big difference between the JSF program and earlier ones like the F-15, etc... When an issue is found in the prototype stage, you simply incorporate the fix into the finalized design.


    Thanks to concurrency, an entire fleet of over 100 aircraft will likely need to be recalled and refurbished to accommodate this fix. This process needs to be repeated for every new issue. Every bulkhead crack, every oil leak, every software bug... They all need to be fixed retroactively. Remember, these are considered production aircraft, not prototypes.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE REAL REASON THE GRIPEN LOST...

Image
  For those of you wondering how Saab lost the FFCP competition, new information has come to light... According inside sources, the initial scoring of the two fighters was incredibly close.  The F-35 did indeed win the "Capability" category (worth up to 60%) while the Gripen E ended up being ahead on both price (worth 20%) and industrial offsets (worth the remaining 20%).   According to my source April Furst, who is currently serving an internship in the House of Commons.  The ultimate decision was made rather hastily while the final scores were being tallied up.   "Due to COVID restrictions and renovations, the FFCP committee were forced to convene in a remote office located in the basement of the Parliament building.  You could tell it wasn't used very often.  Lots of cobwebs, and the whole place smelled musty and moldy.   "The committee members were doing their thing, going down each individual line of the respective offers.  It was actual...
Read more

Fighter Jet Fight Club: Gripen NG vs. Super Hornet!

Image
I will be honest...  I have been dreading this installment of Fighter Jet Fight Club.  I tend to root for the underdog in any competition, but what happens when underdogs have to compete against each other?  Both of these aircraft have a 0-2 record for FJFC, yet both are clearly crowd favorites in the comment section. Our contestants today are two of the biggest value propositions in the fighter world today.  Both are "modernized" versions of aircraft that have been flying since the 80s.  Neither make promises of being the most dominant force in the skies, but they do promise a "90%" solution at "50%" of the cost.  Most importantly, both aircraft are "tried and true" designs that have provided years of faithful service.  Despite this, they are often overlooked in favor of newer, flashier aircraft like the F-35 Lightning II. Which aircraft will see redemption here today? Just remember the rules . Air-to-Ground: Infiltration/Pe...
Read more

Fighter Jet Fight Club: F-35 vs. Gripen

Image
Funny how things go full circle. When I started gripen4canada.blogspot.ca  a few years ago, I was convinced that the Gripen NG (now Gripen E/F) would be a much more suitable replacement for Canada's aging CF-18s.  Much has changed since then, and I have attempted to broaden my scope to look at other fighter aircraft in order to find the "best fighter for Canada". Anyone following the Joint Strike Fighter's saga over the years knows that it is a troubled program.  Despite assertions of progress from both Lockheed Martin and the Pentagon, there is no escaping the fact that the F-35 is still nowhere near the fighter it is supposed to be. When I devised "Fighter Jet Fight Club" I decided that I would need to compensate for the F-35's issues, otherwise I would be shot down as clearly biased against it.  In order to do this, I added two rules: All equipment will work "as advertised".  No buggy software, etc. Cost is not considered. ...
Read more