Enter the (Mighty) Dragon.

I apologize for my extended vacation from the blog.  There has not been a lot of aviation-related news lately, and the Clinton/Trump debacle of 2016 has most of my attention.  (Enough that I have an extended rant ready to post about how Trump's candidacy will effect Canada's long-term defence needs.)

We can thank China for giving us aviation buffs something to talk about.  Not one, but two J-20 "Mighty Dragons" made its public debut the other day, after years of being a poorly kept secret.  While its performance and equipment specifications are still relatively unknown, China has made it very clear that it is now making 5th generation stealth fighters.

From a design standpoint, the J-20 is clearly aimed at the F-22 and the Russian PAK FA.  Unlike the F-35, this is a big twin-engined fighter.  Also similar to the F-22 and PAK FA, the J-20 utilizes four (not two) internal weapon bays.  Its forward weapon bays, likely dedicated to IR-guided A2A missiles, utilized a innovative design that allows for the missile to be deployed on a rail with the door closed.  As seen in this video:

While the F-22 and PAK FA are larger than the F-35, the J-20 is even larger still.  Measuring in slightly larger than the F-14 Tomcat, the J-20 appears to be designed with a similar role of long range interceptor in mind.  The idea of a "stealthy Tomcat" in the hands of a potential enemy is sure to have military planners worried.

More worrisome is the release of images with the J-20 landing on an aircraft carrier (although these are likely photoshopped).

Wait...  What?

The J-20's similarities to the F-22 go beyond the surface.  Beijing has gone on record stating that it will not be available for export sales.  Those nations who wish to purchase a Chinese stealth fighter will instead be directed towards the J-31, an aircraft with an uncomfortable resemblance to the F-35 Lightning II.

Wonder how that came to be?

Despite all the fuss, higher-ups in the Pentagon do not seem to be concerned about the J-20. While it may be equipped with "fifth generation" features like a phased-array radar, electro-optical sensors, and a stealth body; it lacks the "sensor fusion" of the F-35.

This is likely hogwash.

While it sounds impressive in theory, sensor fusion is more difficult than it sounds and getting it right has been one of the F-35's bigger stumbling blocks.  In keeping things simpler, the Chinese have likely avoided some of the JSF's thornier issues.

There is also a likely possibility that the J-20 was never meant to completely outdo the F-22 and F-35.  China already has a substantial presence in the South Pacific theatre.  In a now-infamous simulated air war, China emerged victorious.  This was not through any technological advantage, but sheer numbers and logistics.  The Chinese strategy was simple:  Knock out Taiwanese airbases first, followed by American AWACs and aerial tankers.  With these assets gone, even the "superior" American fighters are limited in what they can do thanks to concerns about range.  (It should be noted that this test was done with Su-35s)

Combine this with the development of an anti-ship ballistic missile (ASBM) or "carrier killer" and Chinese strategy becomes clear.  Simple area denial.  Chinese forces would not have to engage American fighters directly, simply knock out their support structure (AEW&C, aerial tankers, etc.)  A stealthy J-20 could even evade detection long enough to guide an ASBM to its target.

Even if the J-20 is not a modern-day Firefox, it is still a sign that Chinese aviation technology is no longer a subject to be laughed at.  Chinese fighter design has come a LONG WAY since reverse engineering and redesigning a MiG-21.  Building a stealthy long-range interceptor is an accomplishment in and of itself, whether or not it compares favorably to the F-22.

If Chinese aeronautical design has gone this far in twenty years, what will the next twenty look like?


Popular posts from this blog



Foxtrot Alpha: The Super Hornet is the best fighter for Canada.