Indian Rafale confusion.

On again/off again?  
The on again/off again Indian Rafale deal has finally moved on to the next chapter...  The problem is, nobody seems to know how long the book goes on for.

What was to be a order for 126 aircraft has shrunk to a mere 36.  All of those aircraft will be bought ready-to-fly from the French government.  In the original deal, 108 of the 126 Indian Rafales would be license-built in India by HAL.

Ultimately, it was those HAL-built aircraft that ended up being the sticking point.  Dassault declined responsibility of quality control for Indian-made Rafales.  This, along with other factors stalled negotiations to a full stop.

Here we go again?
Of course...  This leaves a 90-fighter sized hole in India's air force.

For now, India has "bought some time" to decide what to do next.  Do they submit a new RFP (request for proposals) and start the process over again?  Do they simply continue to negotiate for more Rafales?  Or do they simply bolster their already existing (and varied) fighter fleet types?

MiG-29K
Perhaps it is time for the Indian Air Force to consolidate its multi-platform force.  In the past, I have promoted a mixed fighter fleet for Canada, but India takes it absurd levels.  These are the fighter aircraft India either are, or will operate in the near future.


  • Su-30MKI Flanker
  • Dassault Rafale
  • MiG-29K Fulcrum (Indian Navy)
  • MiG-29 Fulcrum
  • HAL Tejas 
  • MiG-21M "Bison" (to be replaced)
  • Mirage 2000
  • SEPECAT Jaguar
  • HAL FGFA (developed from the PAK FA)
As you can see, there is a lot of overlap.  Not only that, but the logistical challenges of maintaining eight fighter types sourced from three separate nations must be enormous.  One's mind boggles at the Indian military procurement process...  I wonder what the meeting must be like?

By comparison, Brazil's Gripen purchase seems to be running (relatively) smoothly.

So what does this mean for Canada?  Probably nothing.  Dassault will still very much like Canada to be a customer, but this shortfall does not help its case.  Also, while sales are always good, it would be far preferable if those sales were to traditional NATO countries.  

Perhaps the biggest lesson from the Indian MMRCA is that high-end fighter procurement is a messy, convoluted affair.  Politics can often get in the way of common sense.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE REAL REASON THE GRIPEN LOST...

Image
  For those of you wondering how Saab lost the FFCP competition, new information has come to light... According inside sources, the initial scoring of the two fighters was incredibly close.  The F-35 did indeed win the "Capability" category (worth up to 60%) while the Gripen E ended up being ahead on both price (worth 20%) and industrial offsets (worth the remaining 20%).   According to my source April Furst, who is currently serving an internship in the House of Commons.  The ultimate decision was made rather hastily while the final scores were being tallied up.   "Due to COVID restrictions and renovations, the FFCP committee were forced to convene in a remote office located in the basement of the Parliament building.  You could tell it wasn't used very often.  Lots of cobwebs, and the whole place smelled musty and moldy.   "The committee members were doing their thing, going down each individual line of the respective offers.  It was actually pretty close, by
Read more

FINAL THOUGHTS

Image
  So…. Now what? The process is still far from over but what is left is mostly mundane and bureaucratic.  Stuff like finalizing costs, delivery dates, etc. Hopefully, Canada can now focus it procurement efforts on  revitalizing the rest of the Canadian Armed Forces.  With fighters and frigates out of the way; it’s high time we look into replacing our submarines, MRTTs, and other.  Recent lessons from the war in Ukraine has also made it clear that UCAVs are the future of warfare.  Canada best catch up. Was all this for nothing?  No.  I do not believe so.  Even though Canada is still choosing the F-35, it is doing so in a much more rational way.  We have taken the time to evaluate our needs.  Taken a clear look at the options.  We have arrived at a decision removed from political whim.  Ultimately, Canada is getting a lot more aircraft than initially planned.  We are also getting later build F-35s.  Now, more of the kinks are out.  These newer aircraft should be both more reliable and mo
Read more

Fighter Jet Fight Club: Gripen NG vs. Super Hornet!

Image
I will be honest...  I have been dreading this installment of Fighter Jet Fight Club.  I tend to root for the underdog in any competition, but what happens when underdogs have to compete against each other?  Both of these aircraft have a 0-2 record for FJFC, yet both are clearly crowd favorites in the comment section. Our contestants today are two of the biggest value propositions in the fighter world today.  Both are "modernized" versions of aircraft that have been flying since the 80s.  Neither make promises of being the most dominant force in the skies, but they do promise a "90%" solution at "50%" of the cost.  Most importantly, both aircraft are "tried and true" designs that have provided years of faithful service.  Despite this, they are often overlooked in favor of newer, flashier aircraft like the F-35 Lightning II. Which aircraft will see redemption here today? Just remember the rules . Air-to-Ground: Infiltration/Pe
Read more