S. Korea's F-X competition suspended because fighter jets are expensive.

South Korean F-4 Phantom II, due for replacement.

Previously, I mentioned South Korea's "F-X" fighter competition as "one to watch"since it pitted the F-35 against the Eurofighter and Silent Eagle...  Well, you might as well watch paint dry, because nothing is happening.

Seoul has suspended the program because none of the bids have come under the $7.2 billion (US) budget.  Well, duh.

Canada has allotted $9 billion for 65 aircraft, not counting long term costs.  South Korea wants 60, so the budgets are way off for a similar amount of aircraft.  Did Seoul believe that the manufacturers would keep undercutting each other until jets were being sold at a loss?  That doesn't happen.

So what happens next?  Will South Korea up the budget?  Will it reduce the amount of aircraft needed?  Or will it simply wait until one of the manufacturers comes in with an acceptable offer?  Eurofighter has recently made claims about lowering the Typhoon's cost, but real life suggests otherwise.  Lockheed Martin has also claimed that costs are coming down for the JSF, but some say this is due strictly to number juggling.  All three manufacturers have offered up attractive industrial offsets, as well as assistance developing South Korea's KF-X fighter.

One thing is for sure, fighter jets are expensive.

Comments

  1. Doug AllenJuly 10, 2013 at 1:21 PM

    If cost is the issue maybe South Korea needs to consider the Gripen NG :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Doug AllenJuly 11, 2013 at 8:34 AM

    No arguments here...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Doug AllenJuly 14, 2013 at 1:29 PM

    Hi!

    South Korean decision is kind of funny. But, IMHO, Seoul is mainly responsible for that: with the choice of American hardware nearly all the time, they pretty much 'killed' the competition. Only Eurofighter is the last brave candidate to challenge U.S supremacy in this country.

    In addition, Boeing could not take much risk with a Silent Eagle not fully developed.

    Or maybe Typhoon was the least expensive, which was disappointing…

    Nonetheless, South Korea already has a VERY potent air force, largely superior to the main enemy, North Korea. So, I’m not worrying for them.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE REAL REASON THE GRIPEN LOST...

Image
  For those of you wondering how Saab lost the FFCP competition, new information has come to light... According inside sources, the initial scoring of the two fighters was incredibly close.  The F-35 did indeed win the "Capability" category (worth up to 60%) while the Gripen E ended up being ahead on both price (worth 20%) and industrial offsets (worth the remaining 20%).   According to my source April Furst, who is currently serving an internship in the House of Commons.  The ultimate decision was made rather hastily while the final scores were being tallied up.   "Due to COVID restrictions and renovations, the FFCP committee were forced to convene in a remote office located in the basement of the Parliament building.  You could tell it wasn't used very often.  Lots of cobwebs, and the whole place smelled musty and moldy.   "The committee members were doing their thing, going down each individual line of the respective offers.  It was actually pretty close, by
Read more

FINAL THOUGHTS

Image
  So…. Now what? The process is still far from over but what is left is mostly mundane and bureaucratic.  Stuff like finalizing costs, delivery dates, etc. Hopefully, Canada can now focus it procurement efforts on  revitalizing the rest of the Canadian Armed Forces.  With fighters and frigates out of the way; it’s high time we look into replacing our submarines, MRTTs, and other.  Recent lessons from the war in Ukraine has also made it clear that UCAVs are the future of warfare.  Canada best catch up. Was all this for nothing?  No.  I do not believe so.  Even though Canada is still choosing the F-35, it is doing so in a much more rational way.  We have taken the time to evaluate our needs.  Taken a clear look at the options.  We have arrived at a decision removed from political whim.  Ultimately, Canada is getting a lot more aircraft than initially planned.  We are also getting later build F-35s.  Now, more of the kinks are out.  These newer aircraft should be both more reliable and mo
Read more

Fighter Jet Fight Club: Gripen NG vs. Super Hornet!

Image
I will be honest...  I have been dreading this installment of Fighter Jet Fight Club.  I tend to root for the underdog in any competition, but what happens when underdogs have to compete against each other?  Both of these aircraft have a 0-2 record for FJFC, yet both are clearly crowd favorites in the comment section. Our contestants today are two of the biggest value propositions in the fighter world today.  Both are "modernized" versions of aircraft that have been flying since the 80s.  Neither make promises of being the most dominant force in the skies, but they do promise a "90%" solution at "50%" of the cost.  Most importantly, both aircraft are "tried and true" designs that have provided years of faithful service.  Despite this, they are often overlooked in favor of newer, flashier aircraft like the F-35 Lightning II. Which aircraft will see redemption here today? Just remember the rules . Air-to-Ground: Infiltration/Pe
Read more