From the Ottawa Citizen: Kyle Meema's CF-35 editorial.



Some time ago, the Ottawa Citizen's Defence Watch blog published an editorial by Kyle Meema on why the Saab JAS-39 Gripen would be a great replacement for the CF-18 in Canada.  You can read it here:  Part One and Part Two.

Mr. Meema has returned to the Ottawa Citizen, this time making a case against the F-35 Lightning II for Canada.  You can read the three part series here:  Part One, Part Two, and Part Three.


Here is the article, in its entirety, courtesy of Mr. Meema.

Comments

  1. Doug AllenFebruary 26, 2014 at 6:25 PM

    Just a comment to add that I particularly agree about the sensors and data fusion part : in some articles, it's like the F-35 was the first fighter aircraft to do MANY things, but European counterparts, younger than American teen-series, have already, at least partly, many of the claimed "unique" features of F-35.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Doug AllenFebruary 27, 2014 at 5:11 AM

    If you follow the logic of Kyle Meema's article Canada needs to buy a high performance air superiority fighter that can go into battle with a lot of missiles and has a long range. The answer is clearly the Typhoon. There is no question that it has the speed and agility for the task. The latest tranche 3 aircraft also has conformal fuel tanks as well as drop down tanks for extended range and even with this combination can carry up to 10 air-to-air missiles including the best BVR in the world (Meteor) and best WVR (IRIS-T).
    The Typhoon's range also gives it an advantage over the F-35. Operating with either Storm Shadow or Tauras it can strike up to 500 kilometres further into enemy territory than the F-35.
    Where the F-35 wins is in suppression of enemy air defences, combat with other 5th generation fighters (of which there will be very few of outside the US due to their cost) and arguably close air support.
    To me it all argues for a mixed buy. Maybe 30-40 F-35s and 60-70 Typhoons.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE REAL REASON THE GRIPEN LOST...

Image
  For those of you wondering how Saab lost the FFCP competition, new information has come to light... According inside sources, the initial scoring of the two fighters was incredibly close.  The F-35 did indeed win the "Capability" category (worth up to 60%) while the Gripen E ended up being ahead on both price (worth 20%) and industrial offsets (worth the remaining 20%).   According to my source April Furst, who is currently serving an internship in the House of Commons.  The ultimate decision was made rather hastily while the final scores were being tallied up.   "Due to COVID restrictions and renovations, the FFCP committee were forced to convene in a remote office located in the basement of the Parliament building.  You could tell it wasn't used very often.  Lots of cobwebs, and the whole place smelled musty and moldy.   "The committee members were doing their thing, going down each individual line of the respective offers.  It was actually pretty close, by
Read more

FINAL THOUGHTS

Image
  So…. Now what? The process is still far from over but what is left is mostly mundane and bureaucratic.  Stuff like finalizing costs, delivery dates, etc. Hopefully, Canada can now focus it procurement efforts on  revitalizing the rest of the Canadian Armed Forces.  With fighters and frigates out of the way; it’s high time we look into replacing our submarines, MRTTs, and other.  Recent lessons from the war in Ukraine has also made it clear that UCAVs are the future of warfare.  Canada best catch up. Was all this for nothing?  No.  I do not believe so.  Even though Canada is still choosing the F-35, it is doing so in a much more rational way.  We have taken the time to evaluate our needs.  Taken a clear look at the options.  We have arrived at a decision removed from political whim.  Ultimately, Canada is getting a lot more aircraft than initially planned.  We are also getting later build F-35s.  Now, more of the kinks are out.  These newer aircraft should be both more reliable and mo
Read more

Fighter Jet Fight Club: Gripen NG vs. Super Hornet!

Image
I will be honest...  I have been dreading this installment of Fighter Jet Fight Club.  I tend to root for the underdog in any competition, but what happens when underdogs have to compete against each other?  Both of these aircraft have a 0-2 record for FJFC, yet both are clearly crowd favorites in the comment section. Our contestants today are two of the biggest value propositions in the fighter world today.  Both are "modernized" versions of aircraft that have been flying since the 80s.  Neither make promises of being the most dominant force in the skies, but they do promise a "90%" solution at "50%" of the cost.  Most importantly, both aircraft are "tried and true" designs that have provided years of faithful service.  Despite this, they are often overlooked in favor of newer, flashier aircraft like the F-35 Lightning II. Which aircraft will see redemption here today? Just remember the rules . Air-to-Ground: Infiltration/Pe
Read more